<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USPS Disability Retirement &#187; an attorney who will defend injured federal workers aggressively</title>
	<atom:link href="http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/tag/an-attorney-who-will-defend-injured-federal-workers-aggressively/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com</link>
	<description>Helping Postal workers secure their federal disability retirement benefits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 05:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Employees, FERS &amp; CSRS Disability Retirement,  the National Reassessment Process,  and a Sense of Betrayal</title>
		<link>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2011/06/24/postal-employees-fers-csrs-disability-retirement-the-national-reassessment-process-and-a-sense-of-betrayal/</link>
		<comments>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2011/06/24/postal-employees-fers-csrs-disability-retirement-the-national-reassessment-process-and-a-sense-of-betrayal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert McGill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Actions against the Postal Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWCP Workers' Comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverse actions while in OWCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an attorney who will defend injured federal workers aggressively]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequences of an agency's adverce action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability retirement usps national representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failing to provide limited duty to injured workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal employee removal due to medical conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal owcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal owcp laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intouchable top management bureaucracy and the reciclable labor force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited jobs for light duty employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening to postal employees and turning its back to the elderly and injured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Reassessment Process (NRP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national reassessment program post office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no work available for injured postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not such thing as ''loyalty'' in the post office culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opm disability for federal workers in alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owcp light duty accommodations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owcp vocational rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal management lips service about loyalty and the national reassessment program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service corporate culture of distrust and disloyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal worker owcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redefining competitiveness by usps management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources for injured federal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sense of betrayal among injured postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the national reassessment program outsource of injured on duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the postal service's inevitable path toward self-destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the usps and the disappearance of light duty jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS Workers Comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps workers compensation disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps: not enough money to pay for loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps's lack of loyalty defined as ''competitiveness'']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your medical retirement rights and the national reassessment process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>     Is loyalty a man-made convention?  Is it merely the creation of lords and kings to fool the populace into supporting a mirage?  For, cannot loyalty be purchased?  Cannot the powerful grant enough gratuities to garner the loyalty of the guardsmen?  Ah, but will such loyalty last, or will it wait in the quiet of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>     Is loyalty a man-made convention?  Is it merely the creation of lords and kings to fool the populace into supporting a mirage?  For, cannot loyalty be purchased?  Cannot the powerful grant enough gratuities to garner the loyalty of the guardsmen?  Ah, but will such loyalty last, or will it wait in the quiet of nightfall to see from whom a better price might be paid?  Such loyalty shifts like the sands of summer.  A convention built upon a convention will indeed crumble.  Loyalty must be built upon character, and character upon the integrity and reputation of a man over his entire lifetime.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: right;">    &#8211; From, Kings and Noblemen</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"> </p>
<p>     Having spoken to thousands of Postal employees over the past decade, the common thread which runs throughout the conversations concerning preparing and filing a Federal <a title="More general information about Federal Disability Retirement " href="http://federaldisabilitylawyer.com/" target="_blank">Disability Retirement application under FERS &amp; CSRS</a>, is an undertone of resignation, resentment and realization towards a corporate culture of disloyalty and distrust.  The Postal Worker today is expected to be hyper-efficient, to work and produce more within a restrictively prescribed timeframe, to perform with optimal productivity, and concurrently to maintain a resonance of familiarity, small-town folksiness, and a service-oriented courteousness in communities across the United States. </p>
<p>     In a competitive economy which has had to weather the advent of faxes, emails, attachments to emails, etc.; where Federal and State bureaucracies have expressed long-range goals to attain a &#8220;paperless&#8221; system of administrative processing; and where budget cuts and complaints about the public sector wasteland of taxpayer funds has reached a critical mass of citizen revolt; within the context of such economic, financial, technological and bureaucratic turmoil, the U.S. Postal Service has been expected to remain &#8220;competitive&#8221;.  But &#8220;competitive&#8221; can be interpreted in different ways.  Unfortunately, in the prevailing corporate culture, it is always gauged and measured in the short term, based upon quarterly financial projections.  What happens 5 or 10 years hence is an irrelevancy; whether the U.S. Postal Service posts a profit or a loss in the next quarter is the quantifying meter of success or failure.</p>
<p>     Management often gives lip service about how they benefit from &#8220;listening&#8221; to the workers that constitute the backbone of the U.S. Postal Service &#8211; the Letter Carriers, Clerks, Maintenance workers, Mechanics, and even some mid-level supervisors.  But listening without resultant actions is merely an attitude of patronizing vacuity.  Listening must be purposive and purposeful; and if the <a title="See another related previously published article" href="http://uspsdisabilityretirement.com/2010/07/14/national-reassessment-program/" target="_blank">National Reassessment Process</a> is the best that the U.S. Postal Service can come up with as the solution to maintain the corporate competitive edge in this complex, technological universe, then &#8220;listening&#8221; had absolutely no positive impact upon Management.</p>
<p>     The National Reassessment Process has been a devastating disaster &#8211; both for those affected, and upon the viability and survival of the U.S. Postal Service.  America&#8217;s binary strength and weakness has always been its ability to move beyond the present crisis, and to adapt quickly to the vicissitudes of economic turmoil.  But the flip side is that corporations, bureaucracies and organizations look to the short term as the metric for success; long-term planning results in a future-oriented view for the survival of the company.  One only needs to, by way of metaphor and analogy, look at how the architecture of churches has evolved over the past 2 centuries.  Once, they were built to last for centuries; now, they are constructed to survive the present lifespan.</p>
<p>     The <a title="More information about the U.S. Postal Service and Federal Disability Retirement" href="http://federaldisabilityretirement.wordpress.com/category/u-s-postal-service-usps-disability-retirement/" target="_blank">U.S. Postal Service</a> is on a path of progressive deterioration and self-destruction.  The National Reassessment Process is simply a symptom and indicator of that destruction.  By openly discarding all Postal workers with medical conditions, disabilities and physical limitations, by asserting that there is no identifiable work available for such workers, and to expect all such workers to file for and be placed on the compensation rolls of the Office of Worker&#8217;s Compensation Programs, they have accomplished two (2) goals:  First, they have succeeded in disheartening the entire workforce by declaring that loyalty to the organization is no longer a consideration of employment, and Second, that there is no long-term plan for the Postal Service to survive in this economy, and only the short-term, quarterly profitability margins will be relevant. </p>
<p>     For, ultimately, the long-term viability of an organization is dependent upon the loyalty of its workforce.  Loyalty must be fostered and groomed.  It is, moreover, a tenuous and sensitive element of a business culture &#8211; one of those intangible business assets which cannot be quantified by quarterly profit reports, but through the economic indicators of productivity measures, over several years.  By undermining the essence of loyalty &#8211; of how an organization treats its employees both during profitable times, as well as through trying economic downturns, and especially how it attempts to meet its employee obligations when a worker gets injured or suffers from a medical condition &#8211; the U.S. Postal Service has effectively spelled out its own future.</p>
<p>     Fortunately, all Postal workers fall under the Federal system of FERS (Federal Employees Retirement System) or CSRS (Civil Service Retirement System), which includes Federal Disability Retirement benefits.  While the National Reassessment Process attempts to force all Postal Workers to file for the Department of Labor, Office of Worker&#8217;s Compensation Program benefits, the problem with OWCP is that it is not a retirement system, and will not last forever.  As has been stated previously on many occasions, OWCP is a system of compensation intended to rehabilitate the Postal employee for a prescribed, limited amount of time, on a temporary basis, in order to return the Postal Worker back to its formerly productive job.  During the time that a Postal employee is receiving Temporary Total Disability, he or she cannot work at another job, and earn any wages &#8211; even if the worker wanted to. </p>
<p>     Federal Disability Retirement benefits is a viable alternative to <a title="Comparing OWCP benefits to OPM Disability Retirement" href="http://workers-compensation.lawyers.com/FERS-CSRS-Disability-Retirement-Compared-To-OWCP.html" target="_blank">OWCP benefits</a> &#8211; but an alternative which does not necessarily need to be viewed as a strict dichotomy (i.e., either Worker&#8217;s Comp or Federal Disability Retirement benefits), but a benefit which can be seen as a &#8220;back-up&#8221; system if and when OWCP benefits are terminated.  If a Postal Worker (or any Federal worker, for that matter), suffers from a <a title="Some Health Conditions that may qualify for Disability Retirement for Federal Employees" href="http://www.fers-disability-retirement.com/opm-disability-retirement/index.php/search/" target="_blank">medical condition</a> which will last a minimum of 12 months, and the medical condition prevents one from performing one or more of the essential elements of one&#8217;s job, then it is time to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.  For the Postal Worker who is, or will shortly, fall under the National Reassessment Process, the &#8220;writing on the wall&#8221; is indeed already in print:  The U.S. Postal Service doesn&#8217;t have a future for you, and it is time to consider filing for, and obtaining, Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.  The future is now &#8211; for the Postal Service employee, to think of another career; for the corporate culture of the U.S. Postal Service, to remain in red ink for the foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2011/06/24/postal-employees-fers-csrs-disability-retirement-the-national-reassessment-process-and-a-sense-of-betrayal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Disability Retirement and the Postal Employee Today</title>
		<link>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2010/01/26/federal-disability-retirement-and-the-postal-employee-today/</link>
		<comments>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2010/01/26/federal-disability-retirement-and-the-postal-employee-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert McGill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Actions against the Postal Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light & Limited Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS’ Latest "Great" Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Re-Assessment in the Value of Disabled Postal Workers: NRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a you a federal employer under workers comp?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an attorney who will defend injured federal workers aggressively]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an injured postal worker can always get an "early out" retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[are you a postal worker in light duty?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention postal employees with long-term disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney specializing in disability retirement for postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability retirement in the us postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERS disability retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured postal worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer federal retirement disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer helping postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited duty assignments united states postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail handlers disability retirement benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail processing clerks under workers comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail processing clerks with serious illnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical disability lawyers opm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical retirement for mail carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental psychiatric conditions on postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Reassessment Process (NRP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no light duty jobs in the usps with the recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no work available for injured postal workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPM disability retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal disability for stress or depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service actions against the postal worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal voluntary early retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal worker's guide to retirement under disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal workers with serious illnesses and disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal workers with standing restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ptfs with disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural carriers disability retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nrp us postal disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the postal nrp coming to you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the usps as a dinosaur in a heavily technological world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the usps national reassessment problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps disability attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS disability retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps mail email competition and the injured postal worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[when light duty is not longer available to postal workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>     There are a multitude of changes transforming the U.S. Postal Service today – from outside economic forces, to greater competition, to the increase of email and other technologies which have created enormous pressures upon an organizational entity which was founded with its first Postmaster General in 1775, with Benjamin Franklin at its helm. </p> <p>     [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     There are a multitude of changes transforming the <a title="US Postal Disability Retirement" href="http://federaldisabilityretirement.wordpress.com/category/u-s-postal-service-usps-disability-retirement/" target="_blank">U.S. Postal Service</a> today – from outside economic forces, to greater competition, to the increase of email and other technologies which have created enormous pressures upon an organizational entity which was founded with its first Postmaster General in 1775, with Benjamin Franklin at its helm. </p>
<p>     It is, in essence, a dinosaur in a fast-paced world of changing technological features.  The idea of the friendly mailman, making personal contact with neighbors – all beginning with the large distribution facilities and processing of mail to outlying communities throughout the night – is being replaced with the reality of crunching numbers:  the U.S. Postal Service is an economically dwindling business model, and the reality of the <a title="National Reassessment Program (NRP)" href="http://federaldisabilityretirement.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/federal-postal-disability-retirement-the-agency-the-individual/" target="_blank">National Reassessment Program (NRP)</a> is a cruelty upon the labor force, but a reality which must be dealt with nonetheless. </p>
<p>     While <a title="Voluntary Early Retirement programs (VERs or VERAs)" href="http://federaldisabilityretirement.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/fers-disability-retirement-opm-disability-retirement-voluntary-early-retirement-ver-postal-service-post-office-usps/" target="_blank">Voluntary Early Retirement programs (VERs)</a> have had limited success; and there are no doubt further plans (rumors?) for other such programs to try and shed the workforce in order to survive; for the everyday Postal Worker in a tough economy – the Rural and City Carrier; the Distribution and Mail Processing Clerk; the Mail Handler, the MPE mechanics, the truck drivers, as well as EAS supervisors, Postmasters and multiple other craft and management personnel who make up the entirety of the U.S. Postal Service:  the ultimate question is, What am I to do?</p>
<p>     It is clear that the <a title="Support of the USPS to its Own Employees " href="http://uspsdisabilityretirement.com/2009/11/25/the-support-of-the-postal-service-to-its-employees/" target="_self">U.S. Postal Worker</a> has been, and will continue to, engage in a single focus of shedding its ranks of all but the most productive.  This means, in blunt terms, that if you are a Postal Worker who is unable to perform at the optimal level of capability because of a medical condition, you will be targeted.</p>
<p>     <a title="Federal Disability Retirement" href="http://community.lawyers.com/forums/53.aspx" target="_blank">Disability Retirement under FERS or CSRS</a> is an option which must be seriously considered.  Even in a tough economy (and this present economic recession shows an entrenchment which may last for many years to come, with fluctuations of small improvements in some sectors, and great devastation in other sectors of the economy), Disability Retirement is and should be a viable option to consider.  Receiving a guaranteed annuity of 40% of the average of one’s highest-three consecutive years (60% for the first year), is better than being sent home unexpectedly and without forewarning with a short statement that “no work can be found within your medical restrictions”, and being placed on indefinite LWOP.  Further, since Disability Retirement can take 6 – 8 months to obtain (from the start of the process to the approval of an application, at the First Stage of the process), all Postal Employees should consider filing as early as possible.  Some indicators as to whether it is the “right time” to consider filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Are you on a limited or modified assignment?</li>
<li>Are you on OWCP?</li>
<li>Are you out of sick leave?</li>
<li>Have you been on LWOP?</li>
<li>Do you have a medical condition which prevents you from performing even one of the essential elements of your job?</li>
<li>Have you ever been warned for unacceptable attendance or performance?</li>
</ul>
<p>     These and many similar questions may be indicators that it is time to file for <a title="Disability Benefits for Federal Employees" href="http://www.federaldisabilitylawyer.com/" target="_blank">Federal Employee Disability Benefits</a>.  And – remember – if the National Reassessment Program has not touched your area, yet, it is just around the corner.  But that is an understatement:  NRP doesn’t just “touch”; it comes down like a sledgehammer.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Robert R. McGill, Esquire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://USPSdisabilityRetirement.com/2010/01/26/federal-disability-retirement-and-the-postal-employee-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

