• Postal & Federal Disability Retirement Benefits: Beyond the Efficacy of Advice
    There comes a point where the tripartite intersection between factual urgency, advice, and the receptiveness to such advisory delineations, becomes a futile act of inertia. Facts are often self-evident to most who seek to view and understand them; advice, based upon the facts as presented, is rarely profound or enlightening, and quite often merely states […]
  • OPM Medical Retirement: The Bygone Era of the Single Photograph
    It sits upon a private pedestal, prominent for its centrality and foundational focus; it is that which lives are built upon, like the cornerstone which, if withdrawn, unravels the structural integrity and shatters the countenance of teleological significance. But with time, they fade; that which was thought to be timeless and withstanding of mortality, as […]
  • Federal OPM Disability Retirement: Life’s Spare Parts
    They are left as insignificant cast asides, unused and unusable until an urgency of need mandates their sudden relevance; and in a changed moment, their utility determines the worth and value of existence and retention in the clutter of overabundance. Like the spare tire that is never used, spare parts imply potential need, but the […]
  • OPM Disability Retirement: Light & Darkness
    Darkness is the absence of light; and whether "black" is a color, or the complete expungement or its very opposite, the aggregation and mixture of all colors into a single cauldron of rainbows, is a concept often debated, based upon philosophical paradigms of objective criteria. But darkness is not the same as color, or the […]
  • Expanding the Significance of Individual Federal Employee Disability Cases
    Lawyers daily engage in it; courts are sometimes receptive to it; the public is rarely approving of it. Expanding the literal language of a statute by reading meaning into words, phrases and conceptual paradigms not otherwise manifested or obvious in the words enacted, is a language game which some call intellectual brilliance, while others deem […]
  • FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement: The Purposeful Statement
    Some narratives are written for the pure beauty of style and art; quiet in tenor, like the bamboo hollow whistling in the serenity of a morning breeze as the sun reaches the crest of the distant mountains, the place where wizards and warlords gather in solemn conferences around a fireplace of cooling ashes. Then, there […]
  • Postal and Federal Medical Retirement: The Concealment of Emoticons
    They replace the true face of humanity. Pasted with a quick tap of a computer keyboard, they allegedly represent the state of emotional being of a person, at a given time, within a granted context, in the course of an interplay accomplished in diatribes of virtual reality. Contrast such antiseptic encounters with the profound agony […]
  • FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement: External-Internal Linkage
    Thoreau's observation that the mass of men lead "lives of quiet desperation" holds a profound place in daily acquiescence to the stresses of modernity; the influence and linkage between the internal workings of biology, psychology and the interplay upon health and wellbeing, and the greater macro-impact from the inevitable encounters with the external, objective world […]
  • Federal Disability Retirement: Of Capillary Constancy
    Capillaries represent the smallest of the body's blood vessels, which cumulatively account for the greater part of the microcirculatory means of reaching extremities and body under-surfaces beyond the reach of major veins. Bursting or damaging a few here and there have little effect; cutting a capillary or bruising resulting from a blow to a branch […]
  • Federal Disability Retirement: Of Monsters and Magicians
    Childhood is characterized both by fraughts and fantasies; of imagined universes filled with the realities of the unknown, tempered by admonishments balanced by a world of adults who reassure, mixed with warnings and counsel of what could be. This is a complex, complicated world; to maneuver throughout it all is to first survive successfully the […]

National Reassessment Program

       Postal Workers call me daily inquiring about the viability of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS. Often, it is in response to the U.S. Postal Service’s initiation of actions resulting from the NRP. The “National Reassessment Program” (which is neither a “program” designed with any rational basis, nor a “reassessment” of anything but an attempt to shed all workers from the rolls of the U.S. Postal Service who are not fully productive and capable; but, alas, at least the term “National” does seem true) is designed to, in a heartlessly methodical manner, do the following:

A. Inform the targeted Postal Worker of the unavailability of work.

B. Force the Postal Worker to begin receiving benefits from FECA (OWCP) .

C. Begin a process of “vocational rehabilitation” – a euphemism for trying to locate a private sector job – any job – that you might qualify for.

D. Get you off of OWCP rolls once you are determined to be “suited” to the private sector job.

      The above applies on the assumption that you have a FECA (OWCP) accepted claim. If you do not have an OWCP-accepted claim, then only “A” above applies to you, and you will essentially be sent home without the “benefit” of “B – D”.

       All sectors – Federal and State Government, and private sector jobs – “downsize” during economically challenging times. In this economy, where job growth is stagnant and budgets are being squeezed more and more each fiscal year, the U.S. Postal Service is attempting to shed its payrolls of all workers who are not “fully productive”. With the latest numbers showing that the first quarter of 2010 left the U.S. Postal Service with a revenue decline of 3.9% resulting in a net loss of $297 million, the onerous steps as envisioned under the National Reassessment Program will only accelerate.

      The NRP is a “controlling” mechanism. The methodology of the program is to make the Postal Worker financially dependent upon OWCP payments and once dependent, to dictate the terms of the “vocational rehabilitation” such that you have no choice in the matter. In comparison to Federal Disability Retirement benefits, it certainly pays more (with a dependent, 75% tax free; without a dependent, 66 2/3% tax free, as opposed to Federal Disability Retirement benefits which pays 60% of the average of one’s highest three consecutive years the first year, then 40% every year thereafter under FERS, all of which is taxable). But the freedom which one gives up by submitting to the NRP Program is precisely what is intolerable.

       Many Postal Workers turn to Federal Disability Retirement benefits in lieu of FECA – or, at the very least, file for and obtain an approval for Federal Disability Retirement benefits as a “back-up” system to FECA. In comparison to the “benefits” under FECA (OWCP), Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS (and, similarly, under CSRS, although the percentage of benefits under CSRS remains static) provides the following:

A. It is a retirement system – so that one is actually separated from Federal Service, and further, except for the potential of a Medical Questionnaire every two years (if you are randomly selected), the disability annuitant is not under constant scrutiny

B. An individual Federal Disability Retirement annuitant is allowed to become employed in the private sector and make up to 80% of what one’s former Federal or Postal position currently pays, in addition to the disability annuity

C. An individual under Federal Disability Retirement is not dependent upon the often arbitrary and capricious decision-making process of OWCP. It allows one to decide and determine the future course of one’s life.

       Ultimately, the National Reassessment Program will impact you, the injured Postal Worker, whether today, next week, or a year from now. If self-determination is an important element of your life, then it is wise to take steps today, and to affirmatively make choices soon, before you attempt to go to work one day and are sent home with a letter stating, “There is no work available for you”. Or, you may not even receive the courtesy of a letter.

       The Postal Worker is probably unaware of one additional fact: all these years while the Postal Worker has been in a “Modified” light-duty position, while the U.S. Postal Service “accommodated” the worker by allowing for temporary positions at less than full duty requirements – all these years, that Postal Worker was eligible and entitled to Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS. You may simply have not known this, but being allowed to work in a “light duty” status, or in a “Modified Position”, was never a legally-sufficient accommodation under the law. (See Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management, 236 F.3d 1356 , Fed. Cir. 2001, as well as my related articles on the subject¹). During these years, the system worked in a crippled way — injured workers were allowed to continue to work, and the economy allowed the U.S. Postal Service to trudge along – albeit at a yearly loss.

       Today, however, choices must be made. The National Reassessment Program is here in your neighborhood, and it is no longer allowing for the old system to continue unabated. If you are contemplating filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, now is the right time. To wait is to delay the inevitable; to ignore the inevitable is to allow the circumstances to dictate your future.



¹ The Bracey Decision and other resources published by attorney Robert R. McGill:

a) Brief legal analysis of non-statutory laws: The Bracey Decision.

b) Blogs that mention Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management:

c) Some articles that also mention Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management:

d) Miscellaneous posts:

13 comments to National Reassessment Program

  • Mike Pozonski

    I have been given a jo offer of 45 MINUTES A WEEk. Of course it is at the outer part of the 50 mile limit. A little late, but I am applying for Disability Retirement. Do you know of any others like this? They appear to be giving me 45 minutes to avoid the OWCP retraining and placement. The injury I have will make it difficult to place me. I do have an LWEC for 20 hrs per week (4hrs per day). Rediculous but SNAFU.

  • Tammy Jones

    I have an approved OWCP claim, I have had back surgery. I have been advised that there is not suitable work for my restrictions. My doctor says that my restrictions are permanent. I have been off work for almost a year now. I got a letter saying that my medical benefits were being changed, unless I had changes in my restrictiond that would be re-evaluated to see if work was available. My question is, do I qualilify for medical disability at this point? I have gotten a letter stating that I am now being considered for Phase 2 of the NRP. Do I have to wait to see what work they can rehabilitate me for? What are the steps to applying for disability, and what are the pay differences? My docotr does not say that I cannot work. Only very limitedly and with several breaks to keep my pain managable, I would have to wear a back brace daily. I am aware that I am yet another possible number to be taken off the payroll. I really just need to know what I need to do next. Thank you

  • Deborah Cleveland

    My doctor has stated and is writing my medical disability papers as we speak. However, I am required to attend a Vocational Reassement class 3/31/11 receiving a letter that states I am to treat this day as a regular work day. Does this have a significan meaning in regards to receiving continued owcp compensation?

  • Michael Williams

    Have been in the NRP program for quite a while. Have not filed for compensation from the Dept. of Labor as I should have for no good reasons. Now because of things getting tighter will file to be compensated for the 2.5 hrs that I don’t work per day . At this point it might make sense for me to consider disability retirement. I need to get some good concrete advise on what to do. Would appreciate any help you can provide. PS Have almost 35 yrs service.

  • Sheri

    Can you please call me or email me I would like to discuss some concerns regarding eligibility and consideration for government employment transfer. Thanks Sheri

  • Florenda

    I filed an appeal with the MSPB had a conference call with the judge and the attorney for the Postal Service alone with my rep. The conference called was held in May 2011. The Judge gave us 30 days to reach a decision by June. I’m still waiting on a decision from the MSPB Judge. Do you know how long can a decision take? The Judge claimed that my argument made some valid points. I asked that I be given a total disability retirement paying the same amount that I’m receiving from OWCP which is 75% of my pay. Today, I received a letter from OWCP telling me that they are reducing my pay in half base on the Vocational counselor job finding that goes totally against my medical restriction. Now, I’m given 30 days to submit an argument to OWCP concern the reduction in pay. You stated that now is the time to file for disability retirement. I’m still here waiting on the MSPB and the Union and as of this day I haven’t heard from neither. I was told by a friend that they drop the NRP because it was unconstitutional. Do you know anything about it?

  • Claudia Harris

    I was forced to retire in June of 2009, I had no intentions on retiring, I want to know were are you with the law suit and am I still considered in that law suit.

  • Norman Armstrong

    In response to Florenda’s comment, when you file for disablilty retirement, you are given the “CHOICE” to remain on OWCP or to take your retirement from FERS or CSRS. They CANNOT drop your pay according to the rehab counselor recommendations!!!! I have been on Disability Retirement for a year now,and I am still receiving my 75% from OWCP!!! Call and ask the Human Resource Dept for an estimate of your retirement and a packet for disability retirement. Also have ALL of your doctors information and paperwork supporting your disability.

  • I have been diabled letter carrier for 7 years now. Year and a half ago NRP said there was no work for me as a letter carrier. Have been place on afternoons in custodial craft. Can I still apply for diability retirement even though I have been in a “detailed assignment” as a custodian (which is a permenant position but not in my craft position of letter carrier?

  • To Norman; What you are saying that you are getting disability retirement and OWCP is completely wrong and illegal. If you are getting postal disability and OWCP, this means you are trying to cheat the system or have been given wrong advice. You cannot collect both. When OWCP finds out about this, and they will, you will have to pay back all of this money. You should know better than try to double dip. you can’t collect both, doesn’t work tht way. If your smart and I don’t think you are, you better stay on OWCP. You can do this as long as your doctor say no work of any kind. But change your postal disability papers to a inactive status. People that are hurt from the USPS and are on OWCP and the NRP, will eventually get removed. SO if you are on OWCP, then you have 1 year to get the paperwork filled out and handed in, that is the Postal Disability papers. Fill this out and submit this even though you intent on remaining on OWCP. If your status changes and you get taken off the rolls from the Post Office and then get taken off OWCP, you will then get Postal Disability. But even though your not taking Postal Dis., if you do not fill this out within a year of being removed from the USPS job, you will never be able to get it down the line. So request this disability packet from Human Resources and fill it out and then once approved, ask that the papers be put in a suspended or inactive status. God I hope nobody has to go though this, but at least you will get some money down the line, about half of what workers comp would be paying and then your taxed on this and then your health premiums will go through the roof. Why anyone gets off of OWCP is really ignorant. You will be in the poor house or homeless. Very few people have family they can live with or enough money in the bank to keep up the same living standards. Good Luck, Jack D.Ripper

  • Norman Armstrong

    I am NOT receiving both OWCP and my annuity. I am only getting OWCP periodic roll payments.

  • NORM ! good to hear this and good luck to also and hoping we get some type of a payout form our injustices that the people brought to us by being injured on the job. If you haven’t heard,last year the USPS put the first payment of 400 million into a separate account to pay for the settlements to us and probably the loin share for the law firm that is doing the work. As I said, this is supposedly the first payment with 1 or 2 more to be deposited. I guess upper management was told by their USPS legal team that they will not lose this and will have to pay maybe up to a billion in settlements. Will see what happens later this year or next. Should be getting some type of money within 2 years, my guess that is. When I get the chance to approve or not accept the courts decision, I will vote it down. This because their is allot of people that didn’t suffer as much as others over this, and if I have my way, (by voting the settlement down for a new one) only the injured, and very badly abuse will get the bigger payouts, not the ones that were hurt and went back to work in a month, or even 6 months and didn’t receive any abuse, or sharing our medical files with everyone, etc, etc. I deserve a million for what I went through and maybe more for what was said to me, and the work load I was given while the other 2 employees (african) were allowed free reign during they’re 8 hours, and they were faking. I had 4 surgeries and these 2 clowns had not one, which in itself doesn’t mean they are faking, but if you saw what they did when they thought nobody was looking, and then they are going to get the same payout as me. Norman , you did say in your post that you are getting both dis. retirement and OWCP. Just replying to your own words, but glad you saw the light.

  • Norman, sorry, I guess the usps legal team told them they will lose this, will lose this, sorry ! Jack D. Ripper……..

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>